Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!necntc!ci-dandelion!ulowell!page
From: page@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu (Bob Page)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Copy protection (really, dastardly dongles)
Message-ID: <1588@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu>
Date: Tue, 4-Aug-87 13:14:39 EDT
Article-I.D.: ulowell.1588
Posted: Tue Aug  4 13:14:39 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Aug-87 06:37:38 EDT
References: <8707171737.AA01789@THYME.LCS.MIT.EDU> <437@sugar.UUCP> <11337@amdahl.amdahl.com>
Reply-To: page@swan.cs.ulowell.edu (Bob Page)
Organization: University of Lowell, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 12

kim@amdahl.amdahl.com (Kim DeVaughn) wrote:
>Such negative reenforcement in the Marketplace is the best way to
>bring about *rational* solutions to the Execution Protection problem.

Last night at the BCS Amiga Tech Group meeting I heard the best
description of how to do copy protection and not get people pissed.

Design a dongle that people WANT.  That's just what Digi-View does.

..Bob
-- 
Bob Page, U of Lowell CS Dept.   page@ulowell.{uucp,edu,csnet}