Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!mcnc!ece-csc!ncrcae!ncr-sd!crash!adamsd
From: adamsd@crash.CTS.COM (Adams Douglas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Have you seen the new...
Message-ID: <1518@crash.CTS.COM>
Date: Wed, 12-Aug-87 12:42:29 EDT
Article-I.D.: crash.1518
Posted: Wed Aug 12 12:42:29 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Aug-87 04:13:35 EDT
References: <13738@topaz.rutgers.edu> <1035@unisec.usi.com> <206@dana.UUCP>
Reply-To: adamsd@crash.CTS.COM (Adams Douglas)
Organization: Deep Space Network--JPL/NASA
Lines: 23
Keywords: Power Windows 2.0 & Lattice 4.0

Rob made me think of a point I've wondered about for awhile now. I got
PowerWindows about two months ago (1.2, I believe). I used it for
about a day then went back to my usual method of editing a standard
skeleton file every time I need to create menus, requesters, etc. With
a good macro facility, it strikes me that only an extremely
sophisticated on-screen gadget editor could replace direct coding
using a skeleton structure you're familiar with.

I also _hate_ PW's adding comments after every parameter in every menu
and gadget declaration.

Anybody else want to comment on their methods?

-- 
=======================================================
Adams Douglas	ARPA:crash!adamsd@nosc.mil  AT&T:818-354-3076 <work>
DSN/JPL/NASA	UUCP:{cbosgd | hplabs!hp-sdd | sdcsvax | nosc}!crash!adamsd
		Internet: adamsd@crash.CTS.COM

My opinions! Do you hear? MINE! Not JPL's.

"Do not be angry with me if I tell you the truth." -- Socrates
"Tell the Truth and run."--Yugoslav proverb