Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!cuae2!killer!usl!prm
From: prm@usl (Patrick Royce Michaud)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: The Starboard by Microbotics
Message-ID: <152@usl>
Date: Mon, 17-Aug-87 06:46:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: usl.152
Posted: Mon Aug 17 06:46:18 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 20-Aug-87 06:30:37 EDT
References: <1165@gryphon.CTS.COM>
Reply-To: ut-sally!usl!prm (Patrick Royce Michaud)
Organization: CACS, Univ of SW La, Lafayette, LA
Lines: 31

In article <1165@gryphon.CTS.COM> hrlaser@pnet02.CTS.COM (Harv Laser) writes:
>
>Regarding previous posts concerning the Starboard2 mfd' by Microbotics.
>It's always disheartening to read these tales of woe. However lest
>anyone get the impression that there is something inherently wrong
>with the Starboard, I can only offer this:
>
>		[miscellaneous stuff deleted]
>
>[Realize that I am knocking on wood every couple of words here but] The
>Starboard2 as I received it has worked flawlessly for me, and I've
>recommended it to many many Amiga owners.  Just wanted to put in my
>$0.02 as a satisfied Starboard2 owner. 
>

As I tried to state in my message: I am highly pleased with the Starboard
2 itself--it has been a wonderful companion to my Amy since I received
it in working order. My message was a reply to several people who inquired
about the memory expansion problems I had had; it was meant to criticize
the company's handling of my specific problems, and not to criticize
the Starboard 2 itself (which I myself am pleased with).

At any rate, I'm glad to hear that your Starboard was successful on its
first try--I sincerely hope that other people have shared your luck.

No flames, please -- this message is just meant as a clarification.

Patrick R. Michaud
USL NASA Project Member
"my opinions are my own"
ut-sally!usl!prm