Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!apollo!nazgul
From: nazgul@apollo.uucp (Kee Hinckley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: SR9.5 bug (or am I mistaken)?
Message-ID: <36ca1021.b0a1@apollo.uucp>
Date: Thu, 20-Aug-87 18:59:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: apollo.36ca1021.b0a1
Posted: Thu Aug 20 18:59:00 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Aug-87 12:33:01 EDT
References: <6618@eddie.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: nazgul@apollo.UUCP (Kee Hinckley)
Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, MA
Lines: 16
Keywords: /com/sh, background process

In article <6618@eddie.MIT.EDU> rich@eddie.MIT.EDU (Richard Caloggero) writes:
> 
> ---> It seems that under SR9.5, the shell background process symbol
> "&" is ineffective (I've only tried it in "/com/sh", don't know about
> the unix shells).
> Is this a bug?

Can you send me some more information on this?  I'm unaware of any problems
with '&' in /com/sh.

                                            -nazgul
-- 
### {mit-erl,yale,uw-beaver}!apollo!nazgul  ### apollo!nazgul@eddie.mit.edu ###
### pro-angmar!nazgul@pro-sol.cts.com       ### nazgul@apollo.com           ###
###   (617) 641-3722  300/1200/2400         ###                             ###
I'm not sure which upsets me more; that people are so unwilling to accept       responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate    everyone else's.