Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!uwslh!lishka From: lishka@uwslh.UUCP (Christopher Lishka) Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm Subject: Re: C64 Manual****Saving Files Message-ID: <252@uwslh.UUCP> Date: Fri, 14-Aug-87 12:58:09 EDT Article-I.D.: uwslh.252 Posted: Fri Aug 14 12:58:09 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 16-Aug-87 01:49:51 EDT References: <295@dsacg3.UUCP> <2214@cbmvax.UUCP> Reply-To: lishka@uwslh.UUCP (Christopher Lishka) Organization: U of Wisconsin-Madison, State Hygiene Lab Lines: 45 In article <2214@cbmvax.UUCP> eric@cbmvax.UUCP (Eric Cotton) writes: >In article <295@dsacg3.UUCP> nfs1677@dsacg3.UUCP (Harold Chodnoff) writes: >>2. Is it normal to save a file on disk, after modifications, to the >> old file name and not have those changes saved? It seems that I >> have to scratch the old file in order to save those changes under >> the same name. > >The syntax for save-with-replace is: > > save "@0:filename",8 > >A word of caution here: It is not advisable to use save-with-replace on >the old 1541 disk drives. Delete the file first and then save the new >version. > > Eric Cotton > Commodore-Amiga Hmmmm... I *have* been using the @0: command on my old 1541 drive since I have had it (four or five years now), and have NEVER had any problems. I also thought that a Commodore Representative posted a message saying that as long as one specified the drive number (i.e. the 0 in @0:) that the porblem would NOT occur; the problem only occurred when one used '@:' (i.e. without specifiying which drive). What is the official word on this (yet again), and could we have the advice of someone who designed or knows a lot about the 1541? I repeat that I have never had any problems ever with the '@0:' command, and have used it to an incredible extent (in games such as Elite, when you want to resave your current pilot under the same name, just use the old @0:, because you cannot delete the old file first!). [My apologies to Eric Cotton if he was involved with the 1541 design, or if he is quite knowledgable about 1541's; however, I am positive that I read a message from a Commodore Rep. who said that the @0: command worked fine _as_long_as_you_specified_the_0_] -Chris -- Chris Lishka /lishka@uwslh.uucp Wisconsin State Lab of Hygiene <-lishka%uwslh.uucp@rsch.wisc.edu \{seismo, harvard,topaz,...}!uwvax!uwslh!lishka