Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!husc4!whitney
From: whitney@husc4.HARVARD.EDU (glen whitney)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: AT formatting problem
Message-ID: <2624@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Aug-87 10:28:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: husc6.2624
Posted: Sat Aug  1 10:28:46 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 2-Aug-87 08:47:09 EDT
References: <2598@husc6.UUCP> <455@bucket.UUCP>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: whitney@husc4.UUCP (glen whitney)
Distribution: world
Organization: Harvard Univ. Science Center
Lines: 15

In article <455@bucket.UUCP> leonard@bucket.UUCP (Leonard Erickson) writes:
>is due to FORMAT not checking to see if any of the many buffers it apparently
>needs span a 64k boundary. Supposedly this causes DMA problems.
>	Alll I know is that we have the same problem on some machines running 
>DOS 3.1. It can be solved by changing the number of buffers in CONFIG.SYS


	Do you happen to know if this problem is fixed in DOS 3.3?
--
whitney@husc4.harvard.edu (ARPANET)
whitney@husc4.UUCP (UUCP)
..!harvard!husc4!whitney (also UUCP)
72770,2020 (CIS)

"You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!"