Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!ray
From: ray@madnix.UUCP (Ray P. Hill)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: 386 in IBM AT?
Message-ID: <130@madnix.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 8-Aug-87 11:05:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: madnix.130
Posted: Sat Aug  8 11:05:52 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Aug-87 23:07:46 EDT
References: <1272@killer.UUCP> <503@wolf.UUCP> <407@parcvax.Xerox.COM> <661@hsi.UUCP>
Reply-To: ray@.UUCP (Ray P. Hill)
Organization: ARP Software, Madison, WI
Lines: 15
Keywords: 386, 20mMHz

In article <407@parcvax.Xerox.COM>, burton@parcvax.Xerox.COM (Philip M. Burton) writes:
> 
> Has anyone actually installed the Cheetah upgrade?
> 

Has anyone attempted to use any Cheetah products with XENIX?

I have a 286 class AT clone and would love to upgrade to a 386 machine and
386 XENIX. I don't care if its faster or not I just want to get away from
large/huge model (ie. segmentation).

						Ray Hill
-- 
UUCP: {harvard,seismo,rutgers}!uwvax!nicmad!madnix!ray
            {ihnp4,decvax,terminus}/