Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m6809
Subject: Re: os9 level II development kit
Message-ID: <1955@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 29-Jul-87 01:02:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: lsuc.1955
Posted: Wed Jul 29 01:02:17 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 30-Jul-87 02:39:36 EDT
References: <26@abvax.icd.ab.com> <1099@wlbr.EATON.COM>
Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Organization: Consultant, Toronto
Lines: 17
Keywords: os9 development C
Summary: 'ar' files


     I agree with using 'ar' files where object code is being sent.
Source codes are a more judgemental problem.  In keeping with Net
philosophy, where the code is not too large, or may be useful to
systems other than OS-9, we should be posting them in straight
ASCII (shar'd where there are multiple files).  If the source
code is fairly large and fairly OS-9 specific, but in reasonable
demand, then I think 'ar' files are best.  If demand isn't sufficient,
of course, we have no business wasting Net $$$ posting at all.

Cheers! -- Jim O.
PS:  I *hope* you can post 'ar'.  I had a copy a long time ago and
     as luck would have it, it's long gone. :-)
-- 
Jim Omura, 2A King George's Drive, Toronto, (416) 652-3880
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura