Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mcnc!ece-csc!ncrcae!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!pyramid!prls!gardner From: gardner@prls.UUCP (Robert Gardner) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Drawing in Technical Environment Message-ID: <5277@prls.UUCP> Date: Thu, 30-Jul-87 13:16:31 EDT Article-I.D.: prls.5277 Posted: Thu Jul 30 13:16:31 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Aug-87 10:45:05 EDT References: <3538@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> Reply-To: gardner@prls.UUCP (Robert Gardner) Organization: Philips Research Labs, Sunnyvale, California Lines: 34 Does anyone have experience with SuperPaint/MacDraw/MacDraft/CricketDraw in a technical environment that would care to comment on their relative merits? I used MacDraw for my dissertation and was not unhappy with it, but at work we had heard about how wonderful SuperPaint is so we bought it. I am less than impressed (for use in technical work). For instance, (in the draw mode - the only mode I'm really interested in) it will not rotate text (and cannot even import vertical text), making it useless for touching up or producing graphs; it does not smooth polygons, making it worthless for complex figures; it does not put arrows on lines, so you can't easily annotate figures; the arc tool insists on having endpoints at 90 degree angles (a failing in MacDraw, also); you cannot rotate objects at arbitrary angles (also a problem in MacDraw). I don't have a lot of experience with it, so if I'm wrong, please correct me (how do you get it to default to draw mode?). MacDraft overcomes most of these problems, I believe, but I understand that it is _still_ buggy (and copy protected?). My info is quite old on MacDraft, however. CricketDraw seems to have a number of great special effects, but most of them wouldn't be needed for technical reports. Any info on this topic would be much appreciated. We're currently in the process of a rather large Mac purchase for use in preparing technical manuscripts. Thank you, Robert Gardner P.S. It constantly amazes me how developers can be so ignorant of the needs of technical users of Macs. Everyone thinks of business or desktop publishing but not technical use. Another simple example: PowerPoint does not include sub/superscripts in its wordprocessor (though that is planned). Can you possibly imagine a technical presentation without superscripts or subscripts? Adding support for the technical market involves adding rather minor features (compared with the effort of producing the product itself), but developers seem to be ignorant of this.