Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ut-sally!ut-ngp!ayac071
From: ayac071@ut-ngp.UUCP (William T. Douglass)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Mac C Compilers, Benchmarks, Stupidity
Message-ID: <5884@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 11-Aug-87 21:57:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.5884
Posted: Tue Aug 11 21:57:58 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Aug-87 07:10:09 EDT
References: <3560@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <46745@seismo.CSS.GOV>
Reply-To: ayac071@ngp.UUCP (Bill Douglass)
Distribution: world
Organization: UTexas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 12
Keywords: 68000 68020 80386 mac ps/2 apple ibm byte benchmark

In article <46745@seismo.CSS.GOV> dsc@izimbra.CSS.GOV (David S. Comay) writes:
>the one thing i remember from the byte article is that the binaries
>they used on the mac // were the same ones they used on the mac plus.
>namely, they contained strictly 68000 instructions.

I thought that the compiled code used in the BYTE benchmark came from a
Mac SE with a HyperCharger 68020 board, 16 MHz chip with a 7.83 MHz 68881
co-processor.  Seems that the code generated would be the same for both
machines.  Anyone able to clarify this point?

Bill Douglass
ayac071@ngp.UUCP