Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ut-sally!brian From: brian@ut-sally.UUCP (Brian H. Powell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Determining Machine Configuration Message-ID: <8796@ut-sally.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Aug-87 14:17:52 EDT Article-I.D.: ut-sally.8796 Posted: Wed Aug 19 14:17:52 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 22-Aug-87 02:44:19 EDT Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas Lines: 32 I'm trying to discern the difference in my program between the 64K ROMs, the 128K ROMs and any newer ROMs. (e.g., the SE ROMs and the II ROMs.) I don't have the SysEnvirons glue; apparently that's only for MPW 2.0, and I'm using LS-C. I'm not sure I'll be patient enough to wait for Think to come out with a new version of LS-C which might support SysEnvirons. I don't think 2.11 does. I had honestly hoped that Apple would live up to their pledge of the way they would treat the low-memory global ROM85. (== FFFF for 64K ROMs, 7FFF for 128K ROMs, 3FFF for future ROMs, etc.) My Mac SE says ROM85==7FFF. Uhh. Oops. Apple goofed on that one. So that leaves me with ROMBase+8. On an SE, it has value 0276. On the Mac-Plus it has 0075, on a 64K ROM mac it's 0069 and on an XL 82FF. What are the values for a Mac II? (Can somebody check that out for me?) The old Environs call would return (machine_type == 3, ROM version 76) on an SE. In case you're wondering, ROM85 is a low-memory global at $28E, and ROMBase is at $2AE. Is it sufficient to assume if Environs returns a machine_type == 1 (the _byte_ ROMBase+8 == 0) that I'm looking at either a 64K ROM or 128K ROM Mac? For future reference, does anybody know what the values of ROMBase+8 are supposed to mean in future machines? Brian H. Powell UUCP: {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!brian ARPA: brian@sally.UTEXAS.EDU _Work_ _Not Work_ Department of Computer Sciences P.O. Box 5899 Taylor Hall 2.124 Austin, TX 78763-5899 The University of Texas at Austin (512) 346-0835 Austin, TX 78712-1188 (512) 471-9536