Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!pyrdc!netxcom!beattie
From: beattie@netxcom.UUCP (Brian Beattie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.tandy
Subject: Re: Anyone got a Tandy 1000?
Message-ID: <306@netxcom.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Aug-87 09:26:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: netxcom.306
Posted: Mon Aug  3 09:26:02 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 4-Aug-87 02:49:33 EDT
References: <13938@watmath.UUCP> <720@aplvax.UUCP> <648@ur-cvsvax.UUCP> <1074@elrond.CalComp.COM> <277@iisat.UUCP>
Reply-To: beattie@netxcom.UUCP (Brian Beattie)
Distribution: na
Lines: 32

In article <277@iisat.UUCP> kevin@iisat.UUCP (Kevin Davies) writes:
>In article <1074@elrond.CalComp.COM>, bailey@elrond.CalComp.COM (Dave Bailey) writes:
>> I am considering a 1000sx but was somewhat turned off by the quality of
>> the characters.
>> 
>> dave bailey
>> bailey@elrond.CalComp.COM or decvax!elrond!bailey
>
>If I remember rightly, that's only because of the video board (built in?).
yes
>I'm using a CGA board (doubles as mono-board) and I find the
the builtin video is a CGA type display.
>character quality execellent. I have seen the 1000SX screen, and it's
>only because of the resolution which is around 300x128 (or so) as apposed
It may well be the monitor.  I use a BW monitor and the display is quite
satisfactory.
>to 640x340 which is what I'm using. Get someone at the store where
        240 (if it is a CGA)
>you saw the machine to put in a higher resolution video board
try a better (or BW) monitor.
>-- 
>Kevin Davies		International Information Service (IIS)
>UUCP:  {seismo|utai|watmath|garfield} !dalcs!iisat!kevin
>----------------------------------------

Check before you post.
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Beattie			| Phone: (703)749-2365
NetExpress Communications, Inc.	| uucp: seismo!sundc!netxcom!beattie
1953 Gallows Road, Suite 300	|
Vienna,VA 22180			|