Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!columbia!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!rosemary.Berkeley.EDU!sklower From: sklower@rosemary.Berkeley.EDU.berkeley.edu (Keith Sklower) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Re: Problems with 4.3BSD dipress Message-ID: <19995@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Thu, 6-Aug-87 15:41:05 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.19995 Posted: Thu Aug 6 15:41:05 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 8-Aug-87 12:01:30 EDT References: <125@aiva.ed.ac.uk> Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: sklower@rosemary.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Keith Sklower) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 29 Keywords: Interpress Toolkit, dipress In article <125@aiva.ed.ac.uk> jpd@eusip.uucp (Paul Dourish) writes: >I use ditroff to format documents for an Interpress (Xerox 8044) printer. > [text deleted] >Ditroff runs fine, but runing dipress produces errors like this (I've editted >them to fit in 80 columns): > >(eusip)1% bin/dipress -f lib/fonts/8044 -t simple.dit > simple.ip >dipress: no interpress equivalent for troff font X0111bbbbbbbbbb;;000X0 \ >[More text deleted] >Does anyone have any ideas about how I can fix this? > > -- Paul. >-- >Paul Dourish, ARPA: jpd%ed.eusip@cs.ucl.ac.uk >Speech Input Project, UUCP: ...!mcvax!ukc!eusip!jpd Somewhere about the time 4.3 went out, the person supporting ditroff decide we should go back to Bell's original notion of how big a font name should be -- 10 characters, instead of that which was in 4.2, 3 characters. We get similar inscrutable error messages when mixing a new dipress with old ditroff font width tables, or conversely. I would guess that you are using the 4.2 ditroff width tables, (or rather the 4.2 version of the ``binary compiling'' utility, makedev). Try changing the fields font_name, font_number of structure font_entry in dipress/src/bin/deviceinfo.h to be 3 wide instead of 10, or else change the corresponding fields in ditroff/driver/dev.h to be 10 instead of 3.