Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!labrea!aurora!ames!ptsfa!hoptoad!academ!sob From: sob@academ.UUCP (Stan Barber) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: How do you handle large mailing lists? Message-ID: <172@academ.UUCP> Date: Tue, 28-Jul-87 01:47:46 EDT Article-I.D.: academ.172 Posted: Tue Jul 28 01:47:46 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 2-Aug-87 10:14:55 EDT References: <3600@felix.UUCP> <23828@sun.uucp> <166@academ.UUCP> Reply-To: sob@academ.UUCP (Stan Barber) Distribution: na Organization: ACADEM Computer Systems, Houston, Tx Lines: 42 Keywords: Sun sendmail Xref: mnetor comp.mail.misc:451 comp.unix.wizards:3529 In article <166@academ.UUCP>, I write: # The SunOS3.4 sendmail does not support MX records. It also does not support # the $[ $] cannonicalization convention. These two things alone make it # difficult to use the SunOS 3.4 sendmail on an internet Sun that has to # deal with lots of mail. I would hope the SunOS 4.0 sendmail can do this # stuff. Following this posting, I received mail from Sun agreeing that 3.4 does not support MX records. However, the writer called the statement about $[ $] "an outright lie". And asked that I post a "correction". I replied that I would explain the statement and so I am. ---------------------- BEGIN EXPLAINATION ----------------------------- The claim that $[ $] does not work is based on tests I ran. Does the 3.4OS Sendmail use the YP to satisfy this resolution or does it ask NAMED? If it uses YP, it takes MUCH MUCH longer than asking NAMED directly to resolve the address. In fact I could not get it to work, but I was unwilling to wait more than five or six minutes. If it asks NAMED directly, something is seriously wrong since 4.3MXsendmail resolves in seconds. That is the basis for the "does not support" statement. Perhaps I should say "It also takes greater than 5 or six minutes in the tests I ran to do the $[ $] cannonicaliztion. Using the same tests and the same configuration file, it takes seconds with MX_sendmail." That is not an "outright lie". -------------------- END OF EXPLAINATION ------------------------------- He was also good enough to supply me with a new sendmail that does use MX records. For this, I thank him. If Sun supports all their customers like this, they are to be congratulated. -- Stan uucp:{killer,rice,hoptoad}!academ!sob Opinions expressed here Olan domain:sob@tmc.edu are ONLY mine & Barber CIS:71565,623 BBS:(713)790-9004 noone else's.