Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cwruecmp!hal!ncoast!allbery
From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Symbolic Links
Message-ID: <4185@ncoast.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 16-Aug-87 14:31:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: ncoast.4185
Posted: Sun Aug 16 14:31:01 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Aug-87 00:36:44 EDT
References: <8731@brl-adm.ARPA> <2789@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery)
Followup-To: comp.unix.wizards
Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh
Lines: 26

As quoted from <2789@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> by ekrell@hector..UUCP (Eduardo Krell):
+---------------
| I thought we went thru this a while ago ...
| 
| In article <8731@brl-adm.ARPA> rbj@icst-cmr.arpa writes:
| 
| (about RFS)
| 
| >My lack of specific knowledge of an obscure remote file system does not
| >invalidate my general argument. I was asking him to justify his statement.
| 
| If you lack specific knowledge, then what authority do you have to call RFS
| "an obscure remote file system"?. Or is this just System V or AT&T bashing?
+---------------

Umm, there are two "RFS"'es.  One is a remote file system for BSD that was
posted to the then mod.sources back when NFS wasn't standard yet.  The other
is the SVR3 remote file system.  I wonder if the poster know which was being
referenced?
-- 
 Brandon S. Allbery, moderator of comp.sources.misc and comp.binaries.ibm.pc
  {{harvard,mit-eddie}!necntc,well!hoptoad,sun!mandrill!hal}!ncoast!allbery
ARPA: necntc!ncoast!allbery@harvard.harvard.edu  Fido: 157/502  MCI: BALLBERY
   <<ncoast Public Access UNIX: +1 216 781 6201 24hrs. 300/1200/2400 baud>>
** Site "cwruecmp" is changing its name to "mandrill".  Please re-address **
*** all mail to ncoast to pass through "mandrill" instead of "cwruecmp". ***