Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!bloom-beacon!dyer
From: dyer@athena.mit.edu (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: 80387 Support For SCO Xenix 2.2.1 386
Message-ID: <1234@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 4-Aug-87 18:30:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: bloom-be.1234
Posted: Tue Aug  4 18:30:41 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Aug-87 04:49:00 EDT
References: <164@lakesys.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer)
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lines: 7
Summary: it works for me...

SCO XENIX 386 works just fine with the 387 in my AT with an Intel Inboard
386/AT.  In fact, it says "387 detected" or something similar upon bootup.
Unless Compaq has wired their new motherboard in some bizarre way, I can't
imagine why XENIX 386 wouldn't behave correctly with it.  
Steve Dyer
dyer@harvard.HARVARD.EDU
dyer@spdcc.COM aka {harvard,wanginst,ima,ihnp4,bbn,m2c}!spdcc!dyer