Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!ukma!ukecc!vnend From: vnend@engr.uky.edu (D. V. W. James) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Expiration dates on OtherRealms Message-ID: <1478@ukecc.engr.uky.edu> Date: Tue, 28-Jul-87 13:45:04 EDT Article-I.D.: ukecc.1478 Posted: Tue Jul 28 13:45:04 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 31-Jul-87 06:33:47 EDT References: <2525@hoptoad.uucp> <2821@phri.UUCP> Reply-To: vnend@ukecc.UUCP (D. V. W. James) Organization: Univ. of KY Engineering Computing Center Lines: 26 In article <2821@phri.UUCP> roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) writes: > I agree with John! (*) Nuke the Expire: headers on OtherRealms. To >expound on how rec.mag.otherrealms is different/better/whatever than the >other groups, and thus deserves a longer expiry is pretty arogant (in my >opinion). >Roy Smith, {allegra,cmcl2,philabs}!phri!roy It may be 'arogant', but that does not change the value of the arguements presented. I am posting this from a small system, but even here the cost of maintaining 111k of disk space is trivial. Chuq has presented valid arguements for his use of the Expires: field. OtherRealms is posted to the net as a service, an electronic version of a printed magazine that has attracted national attention for its reviews of SF and Fantasy books. It is argueable that Chuq has, in posting OR to the net, lessened his paid subscriptions. It is also true that he has reached far more people via the Net than he would have otherwise. As his reasons for using the expires field seems valid, and in my personal case allows me to be certain of seeing issues that I could easily miss with a two week expiration, I agree with Chuq's use of the field. -- Later y'all, Vnend Ignorance is the Mother of Adventure. cbosgd!ukma!ukecc!vnend; vnend@engr.uky.edu; vnend%ukecc.uucp@ukma.BITNET Also: cn0001dj@ukcc.BITNET, Compuserve 73277,1513 and VNEND on GEnie Anyone going to Simple Day (in Indianapolis) let me know, I'll see you there!