Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!genat!clunk!forgen!jim
From: jim@forgen.UUCP (Jim Hood)
Newsgroups: ont.jobs,ont.general
Subject: Re: Yearly Question
Message-ID: <184@forgen.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Aug-87 08:39:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: forgen.184
Posted: Tue Aug 18 08:39:32 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 19-Aug-87 05:44:31 EDT
References: <1156@geac.UUCP>
Distribution: ont
Organization: OMNR, Forest Resources, Toronto, Ontario
Lines: 17
Summary: No objections to head hunter postings
Xref: mnetor ont.jobs:166 ont.general:227

In article <1156@geac.UUCP>, david@geac.UUCP (David Haynes) writes:
> 
> The Question:
> 
> So folk, what do you think? Should we rule against head hunter postings
> in ont.jobs? Should we have a special title like HH: Subject? Should we
> force head hunters to contribute to /usr/group (or /usr/group/cdn)?

I have no objections to head hunter postings as long as the volume is
negligible. It MIGHT be useful to have them flagged as such...I dunno.
The funding question is more tricky. While additional bucks could be
put to good use, once they become a "paying customer" you may loose
what control you do have while they have access only through your 
benevolence.
__
Jim Hood
lsuc!forgen!jim