Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!bellcore!faline!ulysses!sfmag!sfsup!glg From: glg@sfsup.UUCP (G.Gleason) Newsgroups: sci.bio Subject: Re: Non-carbon based life Message-ID: <1825@sfsup.UUCP> Date: Wed, 12-Aug-87 20:34:37 EDT Article-I.D.: sfsup.1825 Posted: Wed Aug 12 20:34:37 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 15-Aug-87 05:26:11 EDT References: <265@askja.UUCP> <1767@sfsup.UUCP> <241@etn-rad.UUCP> Reply-To: glg@/guest4/glgUUCP (xmpj20000-G.Gleason) Distribution: world Organization: AT&T Information Systems Lines: 28 In article <241@etn-rad.UUCP> jru@etn-rad.UUCP (0000-John Unekis) writes: >In article <1767@sfsup.UUCP> glg@/guest4/glgUUCP (xmpj20000-G.Gleason) writes: >>In article <265@askja.UUCP> frisk@askja.UUCP (Fridrik Skulason) writes: >> >>> Is non-carbon based life possible? >> ....(Carbon based life)... >>did not start here, but that inter-stelar microbes of viruses seeded >>life on our planet. > > There is a polpular misconception about viruses, namely that they are > the simplest and probably first form of life. Viruses are nothing > but genetic material wrapped in protien. They cannot assimilate > nutrients, and they cannot reproduce alone. A virus replicates itself > by injecting its DNA sequence into a host cell and tricking the host > cell to copy it. I only used the term "viruses" as an example of a small package of life bearing material, I understand your objection. I can also imagine mechanisms that would allow a virus like unit to "infect" our planet. In a primitive earth environment, conditions in the biosphere as a whole might be able to support infection by a particular virus. This would not be a virus capable of infecting any organism on earth today. In any case, this is just speculation, and what I was trying to point out is that a single "seed" from outside might be able to "crystalize" life on the whole planet. A difficult theory to test since all the evidence may have been wiped out already. Gerry Gleason