Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!think!ames!sdcsvax!sdcc6!calmasd!jnp From: jnp@calmasd.GE.COM (John Pantone) Newsgroups: sci.bio Subject: Re: Why are Humans as Smart as They Are? Message-ID: <2346@calmasd.GE.COM> Date: Fri, 21-Aug-87 17:16:12 EDT Article-I.D.: calmasd.2346 Posted: Fri Aug 21 17:16:12 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 23-Aug-87 12:07:13 EDT References: <1041@ttidca.TTI.COM> <2851@phri.UUCP> <2172@xanth.UUCP> Organization: G.E.- Calma R&D, San Diego, CA Lines: 30 Keywords: high foreheads In article <2172@xanth.UUCP>, kent@xanth.UUCP (Kent Paul Dolan) writes: > We continued the discussion for clarification, and she finally gave me > to understand that her (_the_ ?) Chinese ideal of beauty includes a > wide, clear forehead. > > The question that came instantly to my mind (but not lips, I'm > _trying_ to make a good impression on this rather desireable young > woman) was: wouldn't self selection for high, clear foreheads, i.e., > probably enlarged cranial capacity, be an excellent way to bias toward > the reproduction of the more intelligent members of a race/species? Only one problem, Kent. High, clear foreheads don't indicate (necessarily) a large cranial capacity (could have a small hind-head) nor does large cranial capacity indicate high intelligence. Some species of Dolphin, almost all whales and elephants have brains physically larger than ours - yet it is not true that they have greater intelligence. The "classic" anecdote on this subject is the one regarding the largest brain (human) recorded - which belonged to a mentally deficient man. I would suspect that fashions, which concern themselves with superficial configurations, would only very rarely affect substantive things like basic intellegence, etc. More ideas netters? -- These opinions are solely mine and in no way reflect those of my employer. John M. Pantone @ GE/Calma R&D, Data Management Group, San Diego ...{ucbvax|decvax}!sdcsvax!calmasd!jnp jnp@calmasd.GE.COM