Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!ames!lll-tis!ptsfa!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi
From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.math.symbolic,sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Russell's set... paradox... stone too big to lift
Message-ID: <924@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 5-Aug-87 19:36:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: bsu-cs.924
Posted: Wed Aug  5 19:36:08 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Aug-87 07:15:15 EDT
References: <1404@cullvax.UUCP> <902@bsu-cs.UUCP> <4901@j.cc.purdue.edu> <4760@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana
Lines: 8
Xref: mnetor sci.math:1756 sci.math.symbolic:121 sci.philosophy.tech:362

In article <4760@sdcrdcf.UUCP> markb@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Mark Biggar) writes:
>The real problem with "Can God create a stone too big to lift?" is that
>"lift" is ill-defined.  Lift above what?

While we're on the subject, I just noticed that nobody has defined
"stone" either.  What if "stone" means "object weighing 14 pounds"?
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  {ihnp4,seismo}!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi