Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!labrea!decwrl!pyramid!voder!apple!corwin
From: corwin@apple.UUCP (Entomology Lab)
Newsgroups: comp.ai,sci.philosophy.tech,talk.philosophy.misc
Subject: Re: Is Computer Science Science?
Message-ID: <6195@apple.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-Sep-87 01:38:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: apple.6195
Posted: Thu Sep 10 01:38:05 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Sep-87 06:46:38 EDT
References: <5113@sunybcs.UUCP>
Reply-To: corwin@apple.UUCP (Entomology Lab)
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, USA
Lines: 15
Xref: mnetor comp.ai:752 sci.philosophy.tech:467 talk.philosophy.misc:702

In article <5113@sunybcs.UUCP> rapaport@sunybcs.UUCP (William J. Rapaport) writes:
>
>A colleague of mine in a philosophy department recently asked me if
>I could give him "some major causal laws, principles or regularities
>that are special to Computer Science....  (Every science has its special
>laws, so what are some for Computer Science?)"
>
"Anything that can go wrong will go wrong."
"There is always one more bug"
"The differnce between a bug and a feature is that a feature is documented"
-cory
-- 

corwin@apple.[UUCP, CSNET]
Disclaimer: The preceding message is not based on reality.