Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!styx.rutgers.edu!schaffer
From: schaffer@styx.rutgers.edu (Schaffer)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Patrick Hayes on AI & Science
Message-ID: <1217@styx.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 16-Sep-87 10:21:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: styx.1217
Posted: Wed Sep 16 10:21:59 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 18-Sep-87 07:17:01 EDT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 9


Section 10 of Hayes's paper "The Second Naive Physics Manifesto" is
entitled "Is This Science?"  The section is reproduced in full here:

  The earlier manifesto ended on a note of exquisite methodological
  nicety: whether this activity could really be considered *scientific*.
  This second manifesto will end on a different note.  Doing this job
  is necessary, important, difficult and fun.  Is it really scientific?
  Who cares?