Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!johnw From: johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Disk Striping (really RAM vs disk) Message-ID: <419@astroatc.UUCP> Date: Mon, 24-Aug-87 15:54:00 EDT Article-I.D.: astroatc.419 Posted: Mon Aug 24 15:54:00 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 25-Aug-87 06:05:54 EDT References: <414@astroatc.UUCP> <18018@amdcad.AMD.COM> Reply-To: johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) Organization: Astronautics Technology Cntr, Madison, WI Lines: 27 In article <18018@amdcad.AMD.COM> phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) writes: >In article <414@astroatc.UUCP> johnw@astroatc.UUCP (John F. Wardale) writes: >> that moderen disk designs must compete with RAMs and/or RAM-disks > >Come on John, don't be stupid. >You must have temporarily forgotten the difference between volatile >and nonvolatile storage. Sorry Phil (and others via e-mail), but I *DO* know that RAMs are volatile. I didn't say that disks will die tomorrow, but in 2-4 years I assume RAM disks (with *GOOD* power backup systems) will easily be trustable for days! (Anyone who doesn't backup his/her disks (RAM or magnetic) to tape (or preferabely optical-write-only-disks) is really asking for trouble!!! I think that in 3-5 years the common trend will be optical (WO) disks for source, binaries, and backups, while all of /tmp and most development will use RAM disks. Likely the RAM-disks will be on semi-private workstations and the optical-WO's on some kind of LAN. -- John Wardale ... {seismo | harvard | ihnp4} ! {uwvax | cs.wisc.edu} ! astroatc!johnw To err is human, to really foul up world news requires the net!