Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!mcvax!enea!diab!pf From: pf@diab.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: brash micros versus the Big Iron: not yet Message-ID: <299@ma.diab.UUCP> Date: Thu, 27-Aug-87 04:07:27 EDT Article-I.D.: ma.299 Posted: Thu Aug 27 04:07:27 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 1-Sep-87 05:43:06 EDT References: <622@winchester.UUCP> Reply-To: pf@ma.UUCP (Per Fogelstrom) Organization: Diab Data AB, Taby, Sweden Lines: 31 With some interest i have watched the small "war" between as You call it "micros" and "Big Iron". If one looks back and just think about the past: 1. "Yesterday" Big Iron was what supermicros are today. Yes the price per "Mips (hate that term :-))" is much lower then many years ago. But look what You can get for the same ammount of monney that You paid for the Big Iron "Yesterday" today. In a few year there will bee so called 10,20 and even 30 mips micro chips, that will be "very cheap". But only because one type of processors improves (micros), that does not mean that everything else stops. Just compare "solid state memorys" vs "disk storage". And that's only one example. 2. One other point that is interesting (my oppinion) is how much easier it has become for people to access computers. Compare "The Dark Ages" where computer installations was so called "Closed Shops" whith the PC world today. And by the way, just look how much power there is in an $995. PC compared to the "$n*10e6" yesterday mainframes. I don't think it's real fair to compare the raw power of a mainframe system with a microprocessor chip, and then say that micros are so and so much cheaper. Yes, they are cheaper if you only look at raw power, but i think it must be seen in a bigger perspective (e.g. system level). Well, the computer evolution rolls on and will probably not stop in our age. New types of computers will show up (maybe with some new fancy name) having completley different architectures than we are used to.