Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!columbia!cheshire.columbia.edu!yoram From: yoram@cheshire.columbia.edu (Yoram Eisenstadter) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Benchmark results using SPICE Message-ID: <5002@columbia.edu> Date: Wed, 16-Sep-87 13:33:57 EDT Article-I.D.: columbia.5002 Posted: Wed Sep 16 13:33:57 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 19-Sep-87 01:29:49 EDT References: <677@obiwan.UUCP> Sender: nobody@columbia.edu Reply-To: yoram@cheshire.columbia.edu (Yoram Eisenstadter) Organization: Columbia University CS Department Lines: 49 Keywords: (circuit simulator pgm) Summary: Can we have some benchmarks for the 1980s? (It's almost 1990!) In article <677@obiwan.UUCP> mark@mips.UUCP (Mark G. Johnson) writes: >We finally located a VMS-VAX 11/780 with SPICE available, so we ran >the three public domain SPICE benchmark circuits... > > Berkeley-2G6 >MACHINE seconds Vaxes OS, compiler, notes >------- ------ ----- ------------------------- >VAX 11/780 1354.0 0.60 4.3BSD, BerkF77 V2.0 >Microvax-II 993.5 0.81 Ultrix 1.1, fortrel >SUN 3/160 901.9 0.90 SunOS 3.2 f77 -O -f68881 >VAX 11/780 848.0 0.95 4.3BSD, fortrel >VAX 11/780 808.1 1.0 VMS 4.4, fortran/opt >SUN 3/260 744.8 1.1 SunOS 3.2 f77 -O -f68881 >SUN 3/160 506.5 1.6 SunOS 3.2 f77 -O -ffpa >SUN 3/260 361.2 2.2 SunOS 3.2 f77 -O -ffpa >SUN 4/260 225.9 3.6 SunOS 4-beta2 f77 -O3 -Qoption as -Ff0 >MIPS M/800 136.5 5.9 UMIPS-BSD V2.01, f77 V1.21 >AMDAHL 470 V/7 125.5 6.4 VMSP-CMS 4.0, FORTVS 4.1 >MIPS M/1000 114.3 7.1 UMIPS-BSD V2.01, f77 V1.21 >FPS 20/64 48.0 16.8 VSPICE (2g6 derivative) Is anyone besides me bothered by the choice of machines used in this comparison? Note that the 11/780 is a mid-1970's design using mid-1970's technology (they were already being produced in '79 I believe). I think (I'm not so sure on this one) that the Amdahl 470 V/7 is also one of Amdahl's earliest machines. (Does anybody know the vintage of the FPS 20/64? Is it modern?) I'd like to see benchmarks against some modern-day VAXes, e.g., the VAX 8800, and against some modern-day big mainframes, e.g., IBM 3090-class machines. Then, we might get some idea of how little machines like the MIPS and SUN fare against current big timesharing systems. (My guess is that the benchmark will run in under 30 seconds on a 3090, and that the big VAXes will beat the MIPS/1000...) Also, notably absent is the figure for the MicroVAX II running VMS (which is what it was intended to run). What is the "fortrel" compiler? Cheers..Yoram Yoram Eisenstadter | Arpanet: yoram@cheshire.columbia.edu Columbia University | Usenet: ...columbia!cheshire!yoram Dept. of Computer Science | Bitnet: yoram@cucsvm New York, NY 10027 | Phone: (212) 280-8180