Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!im4u!rutgers!pbox!romed!svo!okstate!ks
From: ks@a.cs.okstate.edu (Kurt F. Sauer)
Newsgroups: rec.ham-radio.packet,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Gilmore responds...
Message-ID: <2532@okstate.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 6-Sep-87 21:25:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: okstate.2532
Posted: Sun Sep  6 21:25:18 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 8-Sep-87 06:01:59 EDT
References: <115@splut.UUCP> <598@sugar.UUCP> <2855@hoptoad.uucp>
Reply-To: ks@okstate.UUCP (Kurt F. Sauer)
Followup-To: rec.ham-radio
Organization: Decision Studies Group, Inc., Box 701401, Tulsa OK 74170-1401
Lines: 12
Summary: This is not the best place for this discussion.
Xref: mnetor rec.ham-radio.packet:509 comp.dcom.modems:931

I beg you to move this discussion away from comp.dcom.modems and
rec.ham-radio.packet.  I know this is where the discussion started,
but the S/N ratio w.r.t. the subjects normally covered by these two
groups is growing fast.  Further, I think that the general scope
of amateur licensing (and testing) deserves the more broad heading
of rec.ham-radio.

I urge you to move the discussion to rec.ham-radio, which is the place
to which followups to this message are directed.  Thanks.

Kurt F. Sauer
Tulsa, OK