Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!aurora!labrea!jade!ucbvax!nmsu.CSNET!jthomas From: jthomas@nmsu.CSNET Newsgroups: comp.emacs Subject: Re: gnumacs bindings Message-ID: <8709181153.AA08300@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Thu, 17-Sep-87 16:22:44 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8709181153.AA08300 Posted: Thu Sep 17 16:22:44 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 20-Sep-87 00:51:19 EDT References: <3590005@hpindda.HP.COM> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 30 At 15 Sep 87 16:50:26 GMT, Jack Repenning said: ... If this tremendous cultural river against which Emacs swims is a local phenomenon, then I'm fairly happy with monkeying with the keyboard translate table. It just seemed a little odd that anyone would want to swim against that current in the first place. ... It seems to me that this "cultural river" is relative. Emacs started on a system which used DELete to mean just that (and most of the terminals had a nice DELete key!). Some(how,when) Unix(tm) picked (first "#" and then) BACKspace to mean delete. (I assume some Unix guru's keyboard didn't have a decent DELete key?) Now Emacs runs on Unix systems, and Unix users are used to BACKspace. (But in: ... The problem faced by anyone using an HP keyboard (aren't many other keyboards like this, too?) is that the BACKSPACE key is big, friendly, easy to hit, and used by every other program commonly run to mean (what in emacs we ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ call) backward-delete-character. he said that programs use BACKspace to mean delete - isn't he really saying that most users have stty'ed BACKspace for del ??????) Unfortunately the keyboard world seems to have divided between ones with decent DELete keys and ones with decent BACKspace keys. We can discuss the philosophical ideas of C-h, but for many the non-existence of a DELete key forces the use of BACKspace to mean delete. (And I'm about to buy one of those turkeys!?!?) Jim Thomas jthomas@nmsu.csnet formerly JNTCS@UNO.BITNET