Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!princeton!udel!burdvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrc!agnew
From: agnew@trwrc.UUCP (R.A. Agnew)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Reply to Lt Scott Norton's Maintenance argument
Message-ID: <207@trwrc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 26-Aug-87 14:19:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: trwrc.207
Posted: Wed Aug 26 14:19:17 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Aug-87 03:32:17 EDT
References: <870825204025.575689@HI-MULTICS.ARPA>
Reply-To: agnew@trwrc.UUCP (R.A. Agnew)
Organization: TRW/MEAD San Diego, Ca.
Lines: 12
Summary: Wrong Perspective

In article <870825204025.575689@HI-MULTICS.ARPA> Kamrad@HI-MULTICS.ARPA writes:
>I know your point is well-taken and well meaning but I don't know a
>Program Manager of major weapon build who really cares about

Quit talking to your PMs and read your contract. If you
have a DOD-2167 and /or DOD-2168 requirement then you have
a problem. If you don't you will. Your PM doesn't care about
Life-Cycle-Costs but the folks who awarded the bid to you do.
Care to mention who your customer is?

	Disclaimer -- These opinions are entirely my own and do
	not reflect on my employer in any way.