Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!hplabs!well!mitsu
From: mitsu@well.UUCP (Mitsuharu Hadeishi)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: cfront/c++ problem
Message-ID: <3938@well.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 12-Sep-87 16:27:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: well.3938
Posted: Sat Sep 12 16:27:30 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 13-Sep-87 10:45:00 EDT
References: <6191@apple.UUCP> <253@otc.oz>
Reply-To: mitsu@well.UUCP (Mitsuharu Hadeishi)
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA
Lines: 32
Keywords: pointer to virtual method

In article <253@otc.oz> mikem@otc.oz (Mike Mowbray) writes:
>In article <6191@apple.UUCP>, joemac@apple.UUCP (Joe MacDougald) says:
>> struct T {  /* ........ */ };
>> 
>> int T::getf()  { return f; }
>> 
>> typedef int (T::*PROC)();	// S 5.4.5  p. 154 : pointer to member fn
>> 				// of T taking no args, returning int.
>> main()
>> {
>> 	T t;			// t is an instance of T
>> 	PROC p = &T::getf;	// p points to T's member function getf
>> 
>> /*ERROR*/ int r = (t.*p)();	// call function pointed at by p, assign to r
>> }
>> 

	It seems to be that the correct syntax should be:

	PROC p = T::getf;

	Is that not right?  However, the preprocessor should have gronked
there, not later (type mismatch).
				-Mitsu
				 CDI Research & Development
				 Electronic Arts

This line is for news
This line is for news
This line is for news
This line is for news
Eat this line, sucker!