Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!im4u!rutgers!ames!amdcad!sun!gorodish!guy
From: guy%gorodish@Sun.COM (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: pointer alignment when int != char *
Message-ID: <27452@sun.uucp>
Date: Tue, 8-Sep-87 19:31:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: sun.27452
Posted: Tue Sep  8 19:31:47 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 10-Sep-87 05:43:38 EDT
References: <493@its63b.ed.ac.uk> <6061@brl-smoke.ARPA> <3812@spool.WISC.EDU> <1122@gilsys.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Lines: 10
Xref: mnetor comp.lang.c:4232 comp.unix.wizards:4155

>    So in other words, Mr. Gwyn, what you are saying is that the ANSI C
> workgroup has taken it upon themselves to decide that "portable applications"
> programs have NO NEED to do other than straight sequential I/O on files,
> is this correct?

"fseek" is in the standard.  What is this nonsense about "straight sequential
I/O?"
	Guy Harris
	{ihnp4, decvax, seismo, decwrl, ...}!sun!guy
	guy@sun.com