Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!jade!eris!mwm From: mwm@eris.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: The Amiga unchained, OXXI Modula-2 Message-ID: <5003@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Sat, 5-Sep-87 17:11:44 EDT Article-I.D.: jade.5003 Posted: Sat Sep 5 17:11:44 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 6-Sep-87 20:25:51 EDT References: <466@esunix.UUCP> <4979@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <1919@umd5.umd.edu> Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mwm@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (My watch has windows) Meyer) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 43 Keywords: Modula-2, Programming Environments Xref: utgpu comp.sys.amiga:7666 comp.lang.modula2:336 In article <1919@umd5.umd.edu> louie@trantor.umd.edu (Louis A. Mamakos) writes: I'd appreciate knowing that OXXI obeyed the redistribution <>restrictions on my code, also. Is the source to microGNUemacs on the <>disk? I've got an answer - they didn't use any of my code, so no need to worry 'bout it. OXXI gets credits in my book for playing by the rules. Now, if anybody at OXXI is listening, or anybody has influence, it'd be nice if their changes got back to the mg support group, so we can include them in a future version. Which is not to imply that OXXI will loose credits for not doing so. Just want to give them a pointer to a way to get more credits.