Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!mtune!wrcola!kathy
From: kathy@wrcola.UUCP (K.M.Vincent)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.sources.wanted,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: UCB Mail with reply include
Message-ID: <880@wrcola.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-Sep-87 11:06:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: wrcola.880
Posted: Wed Sep 16 11:06:00 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Sep-87 00:51:06 EDT
References: <1392@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <890@bakerst.UUCP> <1053@moscom.UUCP> <773@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM>
Reply-To: kathy@wrcola.UUCP (K.M.Vincent)
Organization: AT&T, Winston-Salem, NC
Lines: 17
Keywords: mail replies, mailx, inclusion, cute little whatevers
Xref: mnetor comp.mail.misc:536 comp.sources.wanted:2270 comp.unix.questions:4107

In article <773@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM> taylor@hplabsz.UUCP (Dave Taylor) writes:
>To join the clamour that Jim Prescott, Kathy Vincent, and Xev Gittler have
>been raising about including messages into replies:

Clamour?   "A loud outcry. ...  A vehement expression of discontent or
protest. ... To make insistent demands or complaints. ... To exclaim
insistently and noisily. ... etc."  [ American Heritage Dictionary ]

All I remember doing is politely answering a question about how
to put little ">" marks in front of included text in mail replies.

The sed bit works neatly with mailx, too, by the way, as a friend
of mine pointed out.


Kathy Vincent -----> AT&T: {ihnp4|mtune|burl}!wrcola!kathy
              -----> Home: {ihnp4|mtune|ptsfa|codas}!bakerst!kathy