Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!ames!lll-tis!ohlone!lll-winken!csustan!helium!scott
From: scott@helium.UUCP (Scott Hazen Mueller)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Domains and PCs
Message-ID: <50@helium.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 27-Aug-87 13:18:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: helium.50
Posted: Thu Aug 27 13:18:16 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Aug-87 13:19:30 EDT
References: <858@csustan.UUCP> <2831@hoptoad.uucp>
Reply-To: scott@helium.UUCP (Scott Hazen Mueller)
Distribution: na
Organization: City of Turlock, CA
Lines: 24
Keywords: domain, PC, cheap

In article <2831@hoptoad.uucp> pozar@hoptoad.UUCP (Tim Pozar) writes:
<In article <858@csustan.UUCP> I wrote:
<>A few months ago there was some discussion on how to classify PCs under
<>the domain naming system.  Was this ever resolved?  I can't see spending
<>$150/year out of my own pocket just to conform and maybe be easier to
<>mail to...
<   If your refering to the UUCP project, I would guess Mark Horton would
<need to answer this one.  I am orginizing and requesting a new domain:
<     fido.net
<For the most part, these are PCs running MS-DOS, but the FSC protocal is
<being ported to machines running CP/M-80, CP/M-68 and on Macintosh(s?).  
<        Tim Pozar

I'm partially referring to the UUCP Project; also, though I recall that
some people were discussing registering a top-level domain under .ORG and
then turning around and registering subdomains to individuals and others
not willing to cough up the whole cost.

I suppose that I had better clarify my use of "PC" - I have an AT&T Unix-PC,
and I'm already connected via UUCP.

           \scott
-- 
Scott Hazen Mueller   City of Turlock    901 S. Walnut Rd.  Turlock CA 95380
(209) 668-5590        lll-crg!csustan!helium!scott