Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mimsy!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!occrsh!occrsh.ATT.COM!tiger.UUCP!authorplaceholder From: rjd@tiger.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: Lieing to get a job Message-ID: <140200007@tiger.UUCP> Date: Wed, 2-Sep-87 10:54:00 EDT Article-I.D.: tiger.140200007 Posted: Wed Sep 2 10:54:00 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 5-Sep-87 10:21:03 EDT References: <1878@super.upenn.edu> Lines: 28 Nf-ID: #R:super.upenn.edu:-187800:tiger.UUCP:140200007:000:1554 Nf-From: tiger.UUCP!rjd Sep 2 09:54:00 1987 > I have invented a term which, shall we say, treats gently the age-old > practice of plumping up your resume to make you appear to be more > qualified than you are. I call it "enhanced representation." Now, > enhanced representation (e.r. for short) can range from a slight > exageration of the facts to downright lying (Sir Winston called that > "terminalogical inexactitude"). Presenting your background in the most > favorable light does not require enhanced representation, and should not > be considered immoral. Indeed, experts say that many people do not do > themselves justice when they write their resumes. Agreed. In your resume, you should tell all of the good about yourself that a potential employer might be interested in and possibly sway him toward giving you the job. Not lie. Not tell him about the bad things. Some may say that this is lying by omission, but this is what the interview is for, for the potential employer to ask about his concerns and inform you of the potential job so that YOU may be the judge of whether you are able to perform it. If not, you should not accept should you be offered it. You should not be required to put on your resume that all of your coworkers hated to work with you, etc... or that your boss hated you (thats what references are for). Your qualifications stated in the resume had better be accurate, as you will be expected to be able to live up to them or be put in the embarassing position of being fired, with the associated bad reference. Just my $.02 worth (or less). Randy