Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!rochester!ken
From: ken@cs.rochester.edu (Ken Yap)
Newsgroups: comp.org.usenix
Subject: Re: UNIX Review considered sleazy
Message-ID: <1649@sol.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 25-Aug-87 18:42:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: sol.1649
Posted: Tue Aug 25 18:42:47 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Aug-87 02:12:14 EDT
References: <1890@sfsup.UUCP>
Reply-To: ken@cs.rochester.edu (Ken Yap)
Organization: U of Rochester, CS Dept, Rochester, NY
Lines: 11

|At the Summer Conference, I responded to a UNIX Review come-on for a
|free subscription, and responsed to a questionnaire at their booth.

I have a hunch that if you read the fine print on the questionaire, you
will see a disclaimer to the effect that UR will decide who merits a
free subscription. They probably decided you weren't worth sending a
freebie since from your answers you didn't seem like a person with
enough influence. This seems typical of trade journals and I see no
reason to think UR might be different.

	Ken