Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!ames!amelia!msf From: msf@amelia (Michael S. Fischbein) Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.unix.wizards,comp.os.misc Subject: Re: Free Software Foundation (was: Re: Mach, the new standard?) Message-ID: <2727@ames.arpa> Date: Thu, 10-Sep-87 07:12:53 EDT Article-I.D.: ames.2727 Posted: Thu Sep 10 07:12:53 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Sep-87 07:16:39 EDT References: <8520@utzoo.UUCP> <1883@encore.UUCP> <2346@mmintl.UUCP> Sender: usenet@ames.arpa Reply-To: msf@amelia.UUCP (Michael S. Fischbein) Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Lines: 28 Xref: mnetor comp.arch:2132 comp.unix.wizards:4178 comp.os.misc:157 In article <2346@mmintl.UUCP> franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams) writes: >In article <1883@encore.UUCP> adamm@encore.UUCP (Adam S. Moskowitz) writes: >>Why kill yourself to deal with what many people feel is a bad hardware design? > >Well, I can tell you why *we* do it; but that particular reason isn't >applicable to the Free Software Foundation. [The "we" above is presumably Ashton-Tate ] How about rephrasing Mr. Moskowitz's comment to be: Why kill yourself to deal with what YOU feel is a bad hardware design? If someone else wants to work on it, fine. If someone wants to port the code that I've written and promulgated for general use to their favorite odd architecture, more power to them. I feel no constraint to write code with other people's machine peculiarities in mind, and do not attempt to constrain them to write code for my machine. If I did, I would be asking the intel proponents how they could be so clumsy as to write code that wouldn't run on my Iris. I don't; if someone is gracious enough to put useful code on the net and it won't run as is, I'll port it: that has to be faster and easier than starting from scratch. mike Michael Fischbein msf@prandtl.nas.nasa.gov ...!seismo!decuac!csmunix!icase!msf These are my opinions and not necessarily official views of any organization.