Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!rutgers!mtune!whuts!tes
From: tes@whuts.UUCP (STERKEL)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Call for private.flame group was: Allbery's Second Farewell.
Message-ID: <2593@whuts.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Aug-87 10:02:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: whuts.2593
Posted: Sun Aug  9 10:02:37 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 10-Aug-87 00:02:53 EDT
References: <267@brandx.UUCP> <7200004@iaoobelix.UUCP> <289@brandx.rutgers.edu> <320@brandx.rutgers.edu>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 18
Summary: I am lost....is there any content here?

In article <320@brandx.rutgers.edu>, webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber) writes:
> In article <4093@ncoast.UUCP>, allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery) writes:
> > I should point out that all this anti-Allbery verbiage,
> 
> I have only attacked error.  You may, of course, identify with
> whatever you choose.
> 
I, for one, have long since lost the content of these discussions,
if there was any.  In any case, the tone seems to be more
appropriate for the unmoderated *.religion.* groups.  Given the
fact that no one is willing to let anyone else get the last word in
even makes my case better.

Anyone for a "private.flame" group?

On a more serious level, a non-flame discussion of that all those
acronyms, glossaries, concordances:-), whatever, *might* be of
interest to the other 99%.