Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mtune!codas!usfvax2!pdn!alan From: alan@pdn.UUCP Newsgroups: sci.lang,comp.std.internat Subject: Re: generalised alphabets Message-ID: <1222@pdn.UUCP> Date: Tue, 1-Sep-87 11:54:13 EDT Article-I.D.: pdn.1222 Posted: Tue Sep 1 11:54:13 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 2-Sep-87 07:18:05 EDT References: <15488@mordor.s1.gov> <1209@pdn.UUCP> <1296@houdi.UUCP> Reply-To: alan@pdn.UUCP (0000-Alan Lovejoy) Organization: Paradyne Corporation, Largo, Florida Lines: 34 Xref: utgpu sci.lang:1202 comp.std.internat:193 In article <1296@houdi.UUCP> marty1@houdi.UUCP (M.BRILLIANT) writes: >A 32-bit number could code any possible character that can be described >in a square 16 pixels on a side. I think some Chinese ideographs are >more complex than that. With run-length coding, the power of a 32-bit >number is greater, and it might be adequate. An error and a misunderstanding: 1) The number of possible pictures in an m by n matrix of pixels, where each pixel can be one of c colors is c^(m*n). For a 16 x 16 matrix of black or white pixels, there are 2^256 possibilities and a 256-bit number is required. 2) This is NOT what I had in mind at all. I wanted a simple index to be assigned to each EXISTING character or ideogram, which index would be an abstraction independent of any particular graphical representation or font. > >I'm even less certain about the representation of speech sounds. The >possible positions of the organs of articulation are continuously >variable. Human speech can be as fast as about 10 distinct sounds per >second. Coding each sound in 32 bits implies that a vocoder could >encode human speech at 320 bits per second. Is that possible? > There is something called the International Phonetic Alphabet, which uses various modifiers to enable the transcription of any human speech sound with less than 256 symbols. This would probably be adequate, although the finer the resolution (the more characters representing different phones), the less complicated the system of modifiers need to be. pdn