Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!ut-sally!utah-cs!utah-gr!uplherc!esunix!bpendlet
From: bpendlet@esunix.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Technical excellence in publishing (or a lack thereof)
Message-ID: <467@esunix.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 1-Sep-87 12:53:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: esunix.467
Posted: Tue Sep  1 12:53:42 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Sep-87 06:40:48 EDT
References: <13323@amdahl.amdahl.com>
Organization: Evans & Sutherland, Salt Lake City, Utah
Lines: 19

in article <13323@amdahl.amdahl.com>, kim@amdahl.amdahl.com (Kim DeVaughn) says:
> It's sad, really, that the premire technical publications like BYTE and
> Dr. Dobb's have chosen to largely ignore technically superior machines
> 
> /kim
> 
After more than ten years as a BYTE subscriber, the September issue convinced
me to drop my subscription to BYTE. Even Jerry's column was boring this month.

A month or two ago the editorial described the results of a reader survey
they had conducted. It marked the end of BYTE as a computer magazine and 
the birth of BYTE the IBM slave. The survey showed that the average BYTE
reader was an upscale, highly educated, computer illiterate who used IBM
computers at home and at work. My interpretation, not theirs.
-- 
Bob Pendleton @ Evans & Sutherland
UUCP Address:  {decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4,allegra}!decwrl!esunix!bpendlet
Alternate:     {ihnp4,seismo}!utah-cs!utah-gr!uplherc!esunix!bpendlet
        I am solely responsible for what I say.