Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!bbn!cc5.bbn.com!denbeste From: denbeste@cc5.bbn.com.BBN.COM (Steven Den Beste) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Battery-Backed Clock Goes Back Message-ID: <1@cc5.bbn.com.BBN.COM> Date: Fri, 4-Sep-87 09:06:11 EDT Article-I.D.: cc5.1 Posted: Fri Sep 4 09:06:11 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 5-Sep-87 17:30:49 EDT References: <8708300822.AA20905@cogsci.berkeley.edu> <4410010@hpcvcd.HP> <261@uwslh.UUCP> Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, MA Lines: 39 Chris Lishka writes: > > Mr. Brown doubted that a Lithium battery could last 10-30 years, > stating that the life would be more like three years...well, I have > one of these buggers in a digital watch, and I've had the watch for > six years without having to replace the battery. Sorry, that's a SILVER battery, not a LITHIUM battery. Nonetheless, A project I was on at Tektronix used a large lithium battery (two inches diameter by an eighth of an inch thick) to back 4K of CMOS RAM. Our spec was guaranteed 7 years. The only kind of battery I know of that can stand up to continuous charge and uncharge is a lead-acid (that's SULPHURIC acid) battery. They are BIG and CLUNKY and DANGEROUS and let's not and say we did, OK? There are some newer sealed lead-acid batteries intended for this kind of application, but they are still substantially larger than a lithium battery (20-fold?). About the upper limit on NiCads is 100 charge cycles - less if the battery doesn't totally discharge between charges. Of course, I could be wrong about this stuff... I just twiddle bits, I don't grease the electrons... > > -- > Chris Lishka /lishka@uwslh.uucp > Wisconsin State Lab of Hygiene <-lishka%uwslh.uucp@rsch.wisc.edu > \{seismo, harvard,topaz,...}!uwvax!uwslh!lishka -- Steven C. Den Beste Bolt Beranek & Newman, Cambridge MA denbeste@bbn.com (ARPA or CSNET or UUCP) harvard!bbn.com!denbeste (UUCP) I don't think BBN cares what I think about this stuff.