Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!ames!lll-tis!ssc!strovink From: strovink@sscafit-ab.arpa (Mark Strovink) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Copy Protection via manuals (was Silent Service) Message-ID: <197@sscafit-ab.arpa> Date: Wed, 9-Sep-87 15:09:28 EDT Article-I.D.: sscafit-.197 Posted: Wed Sep 9 15:09:28 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 11-Sep-87 04:45:31 EDT References: <8CRONEJP@UREGINA1> <153@jc3b21.UUCP> <2380@xanth.UUCP> Reply-To: strovink@afit-ab.arpa (Mark Strovink) Organization: Air Force Institute of Technology; WPAFB, OH Lines: 32 Keywords: hypocracy Summary: My opinion on manual based copy protection I deleted a lot of lines about Silent Service and copy protection. This is the part I wanted to respond to: > >Sorry, I just don't see _any_ reason to remove "keyword from manual" >protection except piracy. > >Kent, the man from xanth. You never leave a manual at a friends house? Or spill drinks on things? Have you ever seen a manual win a confrontation with an 'adorable' teething 7-month old? None of my manuals have won yet (they must taste better than plain newspaper). I guess nothing ever 'disappears' at your house? When I have a few minutes I can kill on the Amiga, I don't want to spend them trying to find the manual. I tend to enjoy programs a lot more when I only need the manual as a reference (hopefully a dusty one). "keyword from manual" protection annoys me less than other methods. However, most software has enough bugs/features in it that I do NOT need more aggravation from copy/pirate protection. Marauder II does the honest user a favor (not to mention pirates, *please*). Try to imagine multi-tasking if all of your programs wanted you to have the manual handy! Oh heck. Marauder II is a tool. How anybody uses it is out of my control. Should we ban disassemblers, disk editors, and Xeroc machines? Mark Strovink arpanet address = strovink@afit-ab.arpa "I got a round toit, but it broke. Have you seen a part toit?"