Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!labrea!decwrl!sun!pepper!cmcmanis
From: cmcmanis%pepper@Sun.COM (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Need Intuition Help
Message-ID: <27908@sun.uucp>
Date: Mon, 14-Sep-87 14:53:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: sun.27908
Posted: Mon Sep 14 14:53:48 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Sep-87 07:13:31 EDT
References: <86@softie.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Reply-To: cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 27
Keywords: menus,NextSelect,gadgets

In article <86@softie.UUCP> mrr@softie.UUCP (Mark Rinfret) writes:
>Next question: Do the AddGList, RemoveGList functions require fullword
>alignment of the Gadget structures?  I modified some code to use these and
>all hell broke loose.  I know for a fact that my data structures are NOT
>fullword aligned (checked with db).  Reverting to AddGadget, RemoveGadget,
>RefreshGadgets (vs. ..GList) corrected the problem.  If fullword alignment
>is necessary, is there a way to coerce Aztec C to do this for static or
>global preset data structures?

AddGlist() and RemoveGlist() should not have any different alignment require-
ments than AddGadget() or RemGadget() do. The only difference being a numeric
parameter to indicate the number of gadgets to add or remove. Since you are
using Aztec C my first guess would be that you are not casting the number of
gadgets to a long and thus the number it adds or removes is probably several 
thousand. So change :
	AddGlist(&window,&gadget,4);		
		-to-
	AddGlist(&window,&gadget,(long) 4);

[Note I can't remember off the top of my head if the Glist functions can also
 be used on a requester, which would add an addition NULL pointer to a requester
 struct in their somewhere]


--Chuck McManis
uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: cmcmanis  ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com
These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.