Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!cornell!rochester!kodak!elmgate!jdg
From: jdg@elmgate.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: BYTE
Message-ID: <743@elmgate.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 18-Sep-87 08:01:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: elmgate.743
Posted: Fri Sep 18 08:01:05 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 20-Sep-87 00:40:50 EDT
References: <8709090658.AA09801@cory.Berkeley.EDU> <1735@sputnik.COM> <27919@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: jdg@aurora.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky)
Organization: Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY
Lines: 23

>As someone who has written articles for BYTE, the last one pretty much blew
>away a lot of the image processing community if the letters I keep getting
>are a representative sample, I can vouch for BYTE's willingness to publish
>articles about the Amiga. The big problem is to come up with article ideas
>that can be done easily on the Amiga and have relevance for the IBM PC 
>community. 

Is that the point?  Or was the last sentence meant to have a '8^)' after
it?  Why would spend 1-3 weeks of spare time polishing up an article,
that, according to the above comments, *MUST* have some relevance to IBM
PeeCee clone owners.

Why would I do it?  I can't think of any reason.  More to the point,
the above requirement, if it indeed exists, just butresses the notion
the Byte "The small systems journal" should be Byte "The IBM-PC and
Klone and other junk journal".

Cheers, Jeff
-- 
Jeff Gortatowsky       {seismo,allegra}!rochester!kodak!elmgate!jdg
Eastman Kodak Company  
These comments are mine alone and not Eastman Kodak's. How's that for a
simple and complete disclaimer?