Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mcvax!cernvax!lid From: lid@cernvax.UUCP (lid) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: TCP problem Message-ID: <533@cernvax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-Sep-87 18:22:36 EDT Article-I.D.: cernvax.533 Posted: Thu Sep 10 18:22:36 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Sep-87 15:34:52 EDT References: <8709091529.AA02747@ELI.CS.YALE.EDU> Reply-To: lid@cernvax.UUCP () Organization: CERN European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland Lines: 43 We are experiencing a lot of problems with TCP/IP here and I would like to know if someone else out there has seen/solved similar problems. We have an Apollo ring with 2 TCP/IP gateways (Interlan NM10 + dsp[89]0) that connect to our Ethernet, all the machines on Ethernet know about both gateways just like all non-gateway Apollo do. Without a specific reason from time to time some ethernet hosts become unreachable from non-gateway Apollos (but they still work from the gateways), the message we get on the Apollos is "destination timed out". The routing information on Apollo is OK, some other ethernet hosts are still reachable. We almost always have problems with Wollongong TCP/IP on VAX/VMS and with Wiscnet TCP/IP on IBM/VM systems, never (almost) with Ultrix. It seems to me that the Apollo side is OK, I monitored a "ftp vaxvms" and saw: a) the request went thru the Apollo gateway, b) reached the vax (found out with Wollongong's netstat), c) the vax knew about both Apollo gateways, d) but the ftp'ing Apollo never got an answer. TCP/IP on the Vax was working just a couple of minutes before and nobody of the system people was working on it during that time. Just note that the Vax was still able to reach other ethernet hosts, including the Apollo gateway. Does all this resemble something you've already seen ? Any suggestion about what the problem can be ? It seems to me that when we only had 1 gateway things were working better, but I wouldn't bet on this because the TCP/IP usage is steadily growing on our site, so may it was working better just because of the smaller amount of traffic... As far as Apollo hosts are concerned the thing works as you would expect: if the first gateway in the routing table of the Apollo does not answer, the second one is used, providing automatic fall back for Apollo users. All the exercise started to provide more reliable and continued operations of TCP/IP !!! Thanks to all who can give me some hints. Achille Petrilli