Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!cbosgd!mandrill!neoucom!wtm From: wtm@neoucom.UUCP (Bill Mayhew) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: Apple Drive bashing (Was: noKLICKstart in comp.sys.amiga) Message-ID: <688@neoucom.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-Sep-87 09:11:25 EDT Article-I.D.: neoucom.688 Posted: Thu Sep 10 09:11:25 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Sep-87 18:17:07 EDT References: <3905@well.UUCP> <341@remsit.UUCP> Organization: Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Lines: 55 Summary: Apple Head Banger > why 39 times...? When the original Apple Disk ][ and it's controller came out, Woz took a very nihlistic approach. Years back there was an article quoting Woz where he patted himself on the back about the wonderfulness of the Disk ][ and how few parts it had. By the way, he claimed that he even did the art work for the PC board himself. So, the bottom line is that it was essentially a matter of religion that the Disk ][ didn't have a track zero sensor Leaving the sensor out probably saved a flip-flop, inverter gate, and perhaps, a transistor and a few resistors. It probably saved $0.50 to $1.00 in the drive itself too. Now, if they sold 500,000 drives, that would mean a lot of extra profit, assuming that apple charged whatever the market would bear in either case-- which they did. Note that extra money was saved on the original firmware development too, since there was no need to deal with worring about the status of the sensor. What annoyed me was the 5.25 inch Duodisk. It used relatively chintzy ALPS (I think) mechanisms that really aren't up to the pounding of the stepper motor repeatedly at track zero. The metal band that attaches the head carriage to the motor also makes a lot more racket than the plastic sprial used in the older Shugart drives. We've had more trouble with the Duodisks. On some of our Apple // ][ ][+, etc., we've replaced the drives as they wear out with Nihon Office Corp. Toshiba based drives. The Nihon units have an integral controller board that does use a track zero sensor that prevents them from making the b-r-r-r-r-a-a-t!. JDR Microdevices sells these drives under the label BAL-500. See the back of Byte for further info. By the way, I think that the head bangs 35 times. The assumption is that the head might be on the highest numbered track, necessitating 33 steps. I think they throw in a couple of extra steps to make sure that the follower drops into the sprial groove in the case of the Disk ][. I have to give Woz a lot of credit. The Disk ][ was quite an Amazing accomplishment of finesse over brawn. At the time the Disk ][ was introduced around 1979, typical CP/M machines were using controllers that had 45+ ICs. The elegance of the Apple design is very apparent when compared to the kludgey 1541 (also a GCR format) drive that Commodore brought out a few years later. I always wondered why Commodore used their ridiuculous seial bus that made the disk have an effective data transfer rate of about 300 baud! Bill Mayhew, Electrical Engineer Division of Basic Medical Sciences Northeastern Ohio Universities' College of Medicine Rootstown (what a name!), OH 44272-9989 phone: 216-325-2511 (wtm@neoucom.UUCP ...!cbatt!neoucom!wtm)