Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!ll-xn!ames!sdcsvax!thor!hayes
From: hayes@thor.ucsd.edu (James Hayes)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: WIN TCP/IP
Message-ID: <3843@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU>
Date: Mon, 14-Sep-87 23:11:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcsvax.3843
Posted: Mon Sep 14 23:11:36 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 16-Sep-87 05:36:12 EDT
References: <AVGxIIy00W05sxY0=H@andrew.cmu.edu>
Sender: nobody@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU
Reply-To: hayes@thor.UCSD.EDU (James Hayes)
Organization: UC San Diego Funny Farm.
Lines: 20

Michael Meyer writes:
>
>>>o	the tcp server is sloooow -- telnet to a 3b2 running
>	win tcp/ip and "it's like not being there."
>Thats not been my experience.  I use my 3b2's quite a lot and only ever via a
>telnet connection.  I've never been upset with the response.

If you run rwhod and routed, on a large net, your poor 3b2 will sink.  Rwhod 
barely works to begin with, and brings the poor ol' user level TCP/IP
to its knees.

Rumor has it that *REAL* TCP/IP has been incorporated into STREAMS at the
kernel level.  Anybody know?


Jim Hayes, University of California at San Diego.

BITNET: hayes%sdcsvax@WISCVM.BITNET
ARPA:	hayes@sdcsvax.ucsd.edu
UUCP:   {pick one close to berkeley}!sdcsvax!hayes