Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!dalcs!aucs!peter
From: peter@aucs.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Intel Microprocessors (fair benchmarking)
Message-ID: <426@aucs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 28-Aug-87 13:37:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: aucs.426
Posted: Fri Aug 28 13:37:35 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Aug-87 15:41:45 EDT
Reply-To: peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele)
Organization: School of Computer Science, Acadia Univ., Nova Scotia
Lines: 26

in article <4048@utai.UUCP>, anton@utai.UUCP (Anton Geshelin) says:
} 
} In article <416@aucs.UUCP> peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele) writes:
}>I would think the "fairest" benchmarks should compare the following chips:
}>
}>    68000 <--> 8086
}>    68008 <--> 8088
}>    68010 <--> 80186
}>    68020 <--> 80286
}>    68030 <--> 80386
}>
}>And from what I hear, the 68030 blows the 80386 out of the water...
}>
...
} have something to proove have no more fiction to go on.  What we have
} in the preceeding message is a futile attempt to throw some sand
} in the form of 68030 into our eyes.

I posted this because I read this somewhere a while back. It was
was only agreeing and I had no sand in my hands when I posted it.


Peter W. Steele     UUCP     : {uunet|watmath|utai|garfield}!dalcs!aucs!Peter
Acadia University   BITNET   : Peter@Acadia
Wolfville, N.S.     Internet : Peter%Acadia.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU
Canada  B0P 1X0     PHONEnet : (902) 542-2201x121