Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!rutgers!labrea!decwrl!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpcvc0!hpcvck!scott
From: scott@hpcvck.HP (Scott Linn)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Datalight? vs. ????
Message-ID: <4490005@hpcvck.HP>
Date: Fri, 4-Sep-87 14:11:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: hpcvck.4490005
Posted: Fri Sep  4 14:11:24 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Sep-87 06:01:44 EDT
References: <682@cup.portal.com>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, Oregon
Lines: 17

With regards to Datalight...

I haven't used Microsoft or Turbo C, but have used Lattice extensively.
I bought the Datalight compiler a while back, and I like it much better
than Lattice.  The global optimizer really pushes the speeds up on
particular programs.  Execution times are much faster than Lattice.

I run off of a HP110 and HP150, and have had no problems (I can't say
this with other compilers that require "true clones" to work).  Also,
I have grabbed many programs off of the net, written in Microsoft C,
Lattice C, BDS C, some UNIX C compilers, MIX C, Ecosoft, etc...., and
they all compiled fine.

Scott Linn
HP - Northwest IC Division

I have no connection with Datalight except for being a happy customer.