Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!watdcsu!broehl
From: broehl@watdcsu.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: QuickC
Message-ID: <3826@watdcsu.waterloo.edu>
Date: Thu, 10-Sep-87 19:12:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: watdcsu.3826
Posted: Thu Sep 10 19:12:17 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Sep-87 12:06:26 EDT
References: <1485@killer.UUCP> <3320052@hpsrlc.HP.COM> <14563@watmath.waterloo.edu>
Reply-To: broehl@watdcsu.waterloo.edu (Bernie Roehl)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 13

In article <14563@watmath.waterloo.edu> kcollinsthom@watmath.waterloo.edu (Kevyn Collins-Thompson) writes:
>In article <3320052@hpsrlc.HP.COM> darrylo@hpsrlc.HP.COM (Darryl Okahata) writes:
>>
>>     I've also heard that Quick C is a MEDIUM-model ONLY compiler. YUK!
>>
>If it has less bugs than Turbo C it seems like it might be worth
>throwing out Turbo C in favour of Quick C

It's *very* unlikely that Quick C will be less buggy than Turbo; Turbo
has what, maybe four known bugs?  Compare that to some of the stuff
Microsoft has put out, and I'll stick with Borland.  (I forget how
many known bugs were in a recent Microsoft Fortran release, but it
was a *three-digit* number!)